Can the Ethical Best Practice of Shared Decision-Making lead to Moral Distress?

Fecha 2/10/2018 11:09:00 | Categoría: Ética de la gestión clínica

Prentice TM, Gillam L. Can the Ethical Best Practice of Shared Decision-Making lead to Moral Distress? J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Jun;15(2):259-268. doi:
10.1007/s11673-018-9847-8. Epub 2018 Mar 14. PubMed PMID: 29541925.
Disponible en Biblioteca IBB y en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541925

When healthcare professionals feel constrained from acting in a patient's best interests, moral distress ensues. The resulting negative sequelae of burnout, poor retention rates, and ultimately poor patient care are well recognized across healthcare providers. Yet an appreciation of how particular disciplines, including physicians, come to be "constrained" in their actions is still lacking.
This paper will examine how the application of shared decision-making may
contribute to the experience of moral distress for physicians and why such
distress may go under-recognized. Appreciation of these dynamics may assist in cross-discipline sensitivity, enabling more constructive dialogue and
collaboration.



Este artículo proviene de bioetica & debat
http://www.bioetica-debat.org

La URL para este Artículo es:
http://www.bioetica-debat.org/article.php?storyid=2888